From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23998 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2004 13:17:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23975 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2004 13:17:27 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041018131727.23973.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041010000948.17919.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041010000948.17919.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug regression/17919] [4.0 Regression] ICE at /cgraphunit.c:2907 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-q4/txt/msg00122.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-10-18 13:17 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE at /cgraphunit.c:2907 > ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-18 > 04:31 ------- > I see that this looks fixed: > except > that the testsuite looks in bad shape. I don't think the problem is fixed but it's not consistently reproducible. It comes and goes with changes to the distribution tree. I've seen it both on hiauly6 and gsyprf11. Regarding the large number of libstdc++ fails, these are all PCH fails. I think they are caused by the testsuite using a different libstdc++ instead of the just built one. On the other system that I do hppa-unknown-linux-gnu testing on (gsyprf11), I have been testing a patch to consolidate the setting of LD_LIBRARY_PATH into one module. I don't see the PCH errors there. See . Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17919