From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25256 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2004 17:44:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25210 invoked by uid 48); 20 Oct 2004 17:44:14 -0000 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041020174414.25209.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mckinlay at redhat dot com" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040107183737.13604.tromey@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040107183737.13604.tromey@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/13604] AccessController unfinished X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-q4/txt/msg00148.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2004-10-20 17:44 ------- The patch will need to be updated for the new stack trace infrastructure, because the interface to stack traces has changed. In particular, the gnu.gcj.runtime.StackTrace class is no longer supported. Either a) we could add a native part to AccessController which calls the new stack tracer, or b) if we want AccessController to remain pure Java, something similar to the StackTrace class (but perhaps without a gcj-specific name) could be put back in. Either way, this decision should be made in consulation with the Classpath hackers so we all agree on the API between AccessController and the stack tracer. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13604