From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-prs-return-3922-listarch-java-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27024 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2004 17:45:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-prs-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27004 invoked by uid 48); 20 Oct 2004 17:45:17 -0000
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:45:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20041020174517.27003.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "mckinlay at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040107183737.13604.tromey@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20040107183737.13604.tromey@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcj/13604] AccessController unfinished
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-q4/txt/msg00149.txt.bz2
List-Id: <java-prs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com  2004-10-20 17:45 -------
Actually using the native API is probably the better option, since having a
public stack trace API in Java is likely a security problem.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13604