From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17255 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2004 04:53:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17227 invoked by uid 48); 4 Nov 2004 04:53:34 -0000 Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 04:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041104045334.17226.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041028011546.18190.tromey@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041028011546.18190.tromey@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/18190] [4.0 regression] primitive array optimization is gone X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-q4/txt/msg00301.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-04 04:53 ------- Some of the code from java_expand_expr should be moved into java_gimplify_new_array_init. And maybe fix up libjava code or maybe just storing the array's vtable by using a store. I might look into doing this tomorrow. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed|2004-10-28 01:39:42 |2004-11-04 04:53:33 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18190