From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26342 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2004 14:53:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26324 invoked by uid 48); 9 Nov 2004 14:53:06 -0000 Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 14:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041109145306.26323.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041109143610.18399.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041109143610.18399.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/18399] [4.0 Regression] Class initialization optimization does not work with the inliner X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-q4/txt/msg00357.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 14:53 ------- A good small example: public class t { static final int nn() { return 0; } public static void main (String[] argv) { int n = 0; for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) n += nn(); System.out.println(n); } } -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-11-09 14:53:03 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18399