From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15713 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2004 18:06:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15672 invoked by uid 48); 22 Dec 2004 18:06:04 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 18:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041222180604.15671.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "phil at mkdoc dot com" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030521034601.10894.jbrandmeyer@users.sourceforge.net> References: <20030521034601.10894.jbrandmeyer@users.sourceforge.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/10894] Valid import statements are rejected. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-q4/txt/msg00648.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From phil at mkdoc dot com 2004-12-22 18:06 ------- Also affects GCJ 3.3.3 (cygwin special). Can I suggest the summary is changed to "Wildcard import statements not resolved", which seems more specific to me and may avoid duplicate submissions. This test case implements an interface, but the same applies extending an abstract or concrete class, it's the import statement that is the problem: -- WildcardImport.java package com.example.bug; import com.example.other.*; public class WildcardImport implements Interfacer { // Empty } -- Interfacer.java package com.example.other; public interface Interfacer { // Empty } This is with commands like: gcj -C -d /build @gcj-src.txt -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |phil at mkdoc dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10894