From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23885 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2005 02:56:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23870 invoked by uid 48); 6 Jan 2005 02:56:06 -0000 Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 02:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050106025606.23869.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050106021930.19285.mckinlay@redhat.com> References: <20050106021930.19285.mckinlay@redhat.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/19285] Interfaces not initialized by static field access X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06 02:56 ------- This is somewhat related to PR 18868, which has to do with field lookup in this situation. For the interpreter this seems simple to fix. For indirect-dispatch, the init-class call needs to somehow use the really-declaring class as found during linking. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19285