From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20631 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2005 19:03:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20594 invoked by uid 48); 30 Jan 2005 19:02:58 -0000 Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050130190258.20593.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050128192152.19677.wasabi@larvalstage.net> References: <20050128192152.19677.wasabi@larvalstage.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/19677] invalid "may not have been initialized" error X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00242.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-30 19:02 ------- Yes, the underlying problem is the same as with bug 16839. gcj captures all 'final' local variables in an anonymous class. This is incorrect -- it should only capture those which are actually used. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19677