public inbox for java-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion [not found] <20030930095019.12459.suckfish@ihug.co.nz> @ 2005-02-01 18:03 ` kon at iki dot fi 2005-02-01 18:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-15 11:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: kon at iki dot fi @ 2005-02-01 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: java-prs ------- Additional Comments From kon at iki dot fi 2005-02-01 18:03 ------- Shouldn't this block bug 18131? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12459 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion [not found] <20030930095019.12459.suckfish@ihug.co.nz> 2005-02-01 18:03 ` [Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion kon at iki dot fi @ 2005-02-01 18:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-15 11:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-01 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: java-prs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 18:05 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Shouldn't this block bug 18131? Yes I must have missed this bug when creating that meta-bug. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |18131 nThis| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12459 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion [not found] <20030930095019.12459.suckfish@ihug.co.nz> 2005-02-01 18:03 ` [Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion kon at iki dot fi 2005-02-01 18:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-15 11:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-15 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: java-prs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-15 11:56 ------- *** Bug 22496 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |i_mezhirov at yahoo dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12459 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <bug-12459-2018@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>]
* [Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion [not found] <bug-12459-2018@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2007-01-09 20:47 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-09 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: java-prs ------- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:45 ------- All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge. I'm mass-closing the affected PRs. If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it with a note explaining why. Thanks. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12459 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-09 20:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20030930095019.12459.suckfish@ihug.co.nz>
2005-02-01 18:03 ` [Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion kon at iki dot fi
2005-02-01 18:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-15 11:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-12459-2018@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2007-01-09 20:47 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).