From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7644 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2005 15:18:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7622 invoked by uid 48); 14 Feb 2005 15:18:27 -0000 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050214151827.7616.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "aph at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050208143717.19823.matz@suse.de> References: <20050208143717.19823.matz@suse.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/19823] java fails with non-executable memory X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00400.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-14 15:18 ------- This seems to me like creeping featurism. We need to distinguish between fixing this bug in a simple way and adding "nice" new properties that would require a change to the garbage collector's API. At this stage in gcc 4.0 development I don't think that is appropriate. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19823