From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5608 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2005 04:55:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5584 invoked by uid 48); 16 Feb 2005 04:55:24 -0000 Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050216045524.5580.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030408184601.10353.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> References: <20030408184601.10353.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00408.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16 04:55 ------- The Process_* failure should be fixed by: 2005-02-15 David Daney Bryce McKinlay * prims.cc (_Jv_CreateJavaVM): Add comment about initialization order. * posix-threads.cc (_Jv_InitThreads): Call block_sigchld() here to ensure that GC threads inherit the new signal mask. (block_sigchld): Call JvFail rather than throwing exception if pthread_sigmask() fails. But since none of us have solaris we could not test it. The following thread is where this patch comes from: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q1/msg00415.html So which testcases are regressions now (well just to make sure that I don't make a mistake when the next one gets fixed)? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353