From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26659 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2005 23:10:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26635 invoked by uid 48); 18 Feb 2005 23:10:13 -0000 Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 01:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050218231013.26634.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050218145225.20056.bonniot@users.sf.net> References: <20050218145225.20056.bonniot@users.sf.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/20056] [4.0 regression] 'verification failed: incompatible type on stack' with --indirect-dispatch X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00436.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-18 23:10 ------- There is a special case in "putfield" for setting a field before the object reference has been initialized -- this is valid in some cases. This bug occurs because we aren't properly checking all the preconditions of this special case. I have a patch for gcc, I will write one for the runtime shortly. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20056