From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-prs-return-4880-listarch-java-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28571 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2005 20:09:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-prs-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28551 invoked by uid 48); 19 Feb 2005 20:09:14 -0000
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:11:00 -0000
From: "fitzsim at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20050219200912.20090.fitzsim@redhat.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcj/20090] New: gij should be implemented in Java
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00448.txt.bz2
List-Id: <java-prs.sourceware.org>

We need a new class gnu.gcj.runtime.Main that handles the same set of non-jvm
options handled by the java command.  Then gij.cc could use the invocation API
to parse out the jvm options, create a jvm, set up the java argument list and
call gnu.gcj.runtime.Main.main.  This would allow us to easily create a proper
"java" command, using the invocation API.  Also, it would eliminate the need for
libgij.  Instead, one could do:

gcj --main=gnu.gcj.runtime.Main -D...

-- 
           Summary: gij should be implemented in Java
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: libgcj
        AssignedTo: fitzsim at redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: fitzsim at redhat dot com
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-prs at gcc dot gnu
                    dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20090