From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7011 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2005 20:17:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6310 invoked by uid 48); 1 Mar 2005 20:17:15 -0000 Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050301201715.6308.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050301200941.20267.niggadaz@alum.rpi.edu> References: <20050301200941.20267.niggadaz@alum.rpi.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/20267] too few arguments to function _Jv_AllocObject when class/object instantiated with new operator. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00550.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01 20:17 ------- You seem to intermixing compiler versions and libgcj versions. This works for me and many other people. How are you building gcj/libgcj? Are you really building the full GCC or just libjava (which is not supported at all)? -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20267