From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25662 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2005 00:11:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25527 invoked by uid 48); 2 Mar 2005 00:11:23 -0000 Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 03:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050302001123.25526.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "bonniot at users dot sf dot net" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20020130042601.5537.daniel.bonniot@inria.fr> References: <20020130042601.5537.daniel.bonniot@inria.fr> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/5537] Error compiling simple bytecode with jsr X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00554.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bonniot at users dot sf dot net 2005-03-02 00:11 ------- What's the take on this bug? Can indirect-dispatch be made the default in the foreseable future? Can the old verifier be fixed? I'm now running nightly builds of gcj on the Nice compiler testsuite (1250 testcases). There are currently 11 failures, and 4 seem to be instances of this verifier bug. So fixing this would be a great improvement. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5537