From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4283 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2005 10:13:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4253 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2005 10:13:30 -0000 Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050302101330.4251.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "daniel dot bonniot at inria dot fr" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20020130042601.5537.daniel.bonniot@inria.fr> References: <20020130042601.5537.daniel.bonniot@inria.fr> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/5537] Error compiling simple bytecode with jsr X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00561.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From daniel dot bonniot at inria dot fr 2005-03-02 10:13 ------- Subject: Re: Error compiling simple bytecode with jsr > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q1/msg00568.html > >which makes even the non-indirect-dispatch case use the new >shiny verifier. > >It definitely fixes this PR and a whole lot of other verifier >bugs. Can you test it with your application too? (Thanks in >advance for doing it.) > > OK, I patched my tree, I'll report the results (fixes and regressions) after the next build. In your list message, you mention only one fix in the gcc testsuite, pr13107. Does this mean pr5537 is not fixed, or it does not have a testcase? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5537