From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1347 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2005 22:11:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1331 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2005 22:11:41 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050309221141.1328.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050308210915.20389.daney@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050308210915.20389.daney@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/20389] [4.0/4.1 Regression] BufferedInputStream gets ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExeception X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00684.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09 22:11 ------- Subject: Bug 20389 CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc Module name: gcc Changes by: daney@gcc.gnu.org 2005-03-09 22:11:34 Modified files: libjava : ChangeLog libjava/java/io: BufferedInputStream.java InputStreamReader.java Log message: 2005-03-09 David Daney PR libgcj/20389 Merge BufferedInputStream from GNU Classpath. * java/io/BufferedInputStream.java (marktarget): Field removed. (CHUNKSIZE): Field removed. (bufferSize): New field. (BufferedInputStream): Initialize fields. (close): Invalidate mark and buffer indexes. (mark): Rewritten. (read()): Move mark handling code to refill. (read(byte[], int, int)): Ditto. (skip): Ditto and simplify EOF testing. (refill): Rewritten. * java/io/InputStreamReader.java (refill): Removed mark and reset of internal BufferedInputStream. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3406&r2=1.3407 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/java/io/BufferedInputStream.java.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.11&r2=1.12 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/java/io/InputStreamReader.java.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.18&r2=1.19 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20389