From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2471 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2005 11:53:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2449 invoked by uid 48); 29 Mar 2005 11:53:08 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050329115308.2448.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "phil at mkdoc dot com" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040511154000.15377.nmoyere@calendra.com> References: <20040511154000.15377.nmoyere@calendra.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/15377] GCJ does not use the good package for imported classes X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00806.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From phil at mkdoc dot com 2005-03-29 11:53 ------- I have seen similar behaviour to this where concrete classes are named after their interfaces. I haven't been able to to produce a simple test case. This bug looks very similar to bug 18796. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |phil at mkdoc dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15377