From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18524 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2005 18:41:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12967 invoked by uid 48); 5 Apr 2005 18:35:07 -0000 Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 18:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050405183502.12966.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mckinlay at redhat dot com" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050405181151.20768.overholt@redhat.com> References: <20050405181151.20768.overholt@redhat.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/20768] Bytecode -> native code doesn't handle exception properly X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-04-05 18:33 ------- Confirmed. There seems to be something unique about the exception table generated by ecj which confuses gcj. Note that this happens both with or without optimization. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-04-05 18:33:25 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20768