From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2709 invoked by alias); 6 May 2005 14:50:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2683 invoked by uid 48); 6 May 2005 14:50:26 -0000 Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 14:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050506145026.2682.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mark at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050506142914.21418.mark@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050506142914.21418.mark@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/21418] Order of source files matters when compiling X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00374.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-06 14:50 ------- > I thought I saw something like this before. You are probably refering to bug #17845 which was recently closed since it couldn't be reproduced (because I added a workaround to GNU Classpath). I cannot say with certainty that this is the same bug though. The main difference with that bug is that we have a testcase here (even though there was another workaround added to GNU Classpath CVS). -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-05-06 14:50:24 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21418