From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-prs-return-5694-listarch-java-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1073 invoked by alias); 12 May 2005 18:32:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-prs-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1056 invoked by uid 48); 12 May 2005 18:32:38 -0000
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 18:32:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050512183238.1054.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "jradel at 2wire dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050511233822.21524.jradel@2wire.com>
References: <20050511233822.21524.jradel@2wire.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcj/21524] Cancelling a TimerTask puts Timer binary heap in inconsistent state
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00432.txt.bz2
List-Id: <java-prs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From jradel at 2wire dot com  2005-05-12 18:32 -------
(From update of attachment 8868)
Ignore this first proposed fix... it's buggy. Working on a new version.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #8868 is|0                           |1
           obsolete|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21524