From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2511 invoked by alias); 13 May 2005 16:30:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2490 invoked by uid 48); 13 May 2005 16:30:31 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 16:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050513163031.2489.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050511233822.21524.jradel@2wire.com> References: <20050511233822.21524.jradel@2wire.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/21524] Cancelling a TimerTask puts Timer binary heap in inconsistent state X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00436.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-13 16:30 ------- Could you write a reduced test case? Ideally it would be in Mauve form; that way we can easily put it in the test suite when we put in the fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21524