From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18715 invoked by alias); 28 May 2005 18:06:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18691 invoked by uid 48); 28 May 2005 18:06:11 -0000 Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 18:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050528180611.18690.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "ziga at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050312053647.20435.green@redhat.com> References: <20050312053647.20435.green@redhat.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/20435] regex pattern compiling bug X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00613.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From ziga at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-28 18:06 ------- Confirmed. This regular expression makes use of possessive quantifiers (?+, *+, ++, {n,m}+), which gnu.regexp doesn't support currently. I've written some Mauve test cases[1] for possessive quantifiers and will be sending a patch adding the necessary support to classpath-patches shortly. [1] http://sources.redhat.com/ml/mauve-patches/2005/msg00049.html -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ziga at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20435