From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8063 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2005 17:22:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8042 invoked by uid 48); 29 Jun 2005 17:22:41 -0000 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050629172241.8041.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050628023007.22211.greenrd@greenrd.org> References: <20050628023007.22211.greenrd@greenrd.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/22211] Thread.interrupt sometimes causes abort if thread is already dead X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00872.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-29 17:22 ------- Actually, I wrote a very simple test case and I'm simply going to check in my fix. The test just makes a Thread and calls interrupt on it before starting it. With gij this currently aborts. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22211