From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9490 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2005 09:41:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9465 invoked by uid 48); 2 Sep 2005 09:41:56 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 09:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050902094156.9464.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050831205412.23662.ngmlinux@gmail.com> References: <20050831205412.23662.ngmlinux@gmail.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug boehm-gc/23662] Binaries generated by arm-linux-gcj segfault on execution on arm target X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q3/txt/msg00492.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-02 09:41 ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > I think it is the same problem with Boehm-GC on ARM/Linux that > > has been solved in upstream sources. > > Has this fix been officially submited to gcc for inclusion in 4.0.X? We import the Boehm-GC from time to time into mainline CVS (GCC) from upstream sources. I think upstream sources already have this patch applied. It is unlikely that the 4.0.x series will pick up an updated Boehm-GC, though mainline can (although it is a bit too close to the 4.1 freeze). In the interim, you can see if this resolves your issue and get by with a local patch. > Are any fixes required on the target itself (ie. in it's libraries) or just on > the arm-linux-gcj cross compiler source? Sorry, I don't know the answer to this as I work on x86-linux only. But from perusing the related messages, it does not look like any other change is needed, but I might be mistaken. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23662