From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20252 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2005 07:45:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20214 invoked by uid 48); 29 Sep 2005 07:45:29 -0000 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050929074529.20213.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050922172805.24018.mckinlay@redhat.com> References: <20050922172805.24018.mckinlay@redhat.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/24018] [meta-bug] Patches that should be applied to 4.0 branch X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-q3/txt/msg00670.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-29 07:45 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #5) > > PR 19870. Although these patches are largeish, they have been tested in HEAD for > > some time and should be pretty safe. They are needed for OO.org. > > A "naive" backport doesn't work, see the thread starting at > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2005-09/msg00118.html That's because PR21844 addresses a minor fallout of the first part of the fix for PR19870. The complete fix for PR19870 should only be applied if the fix for PR21844 is also applied after that. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24018