From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29070 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2006 17:07:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 28966 invoked by uid 48); 29 Jan 2006 17:07:23 -0000 Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060129170723.28962.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/10353] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Java testsuite failures In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00061.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #25 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-29 17:07 ------- Status for 4.1.0pre on Solaris 7, 8, 9 and 10: 32-bit: === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - source compiled test FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - gij test FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - bytecode->native test FAIL: FileHandleGcTest -O3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - gij test FAIL: FileHandleGcTest -O3 execution - bytecode->native test === libjava Summary === # of expected passes 3995 # of unexpected failures 8 # of expected failures 10 # of untested testcases 16 64-bit: === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - source compiled test FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - gij test FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - bytecode->native test FAIL: FileHandleGcTest -O3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: FileHandleGcTest execution - gij test FAIL: FileHandleGcTest -O3 execution - bytecode->native test FAIL: Throw_2 execution - gij test FAIL: Throw_2 execution - gij test === libjava Summary === # of expected passes 3991 # of unexpected failures 10 # of expected failures 10 # of untested testcases 18 i.e. we are on par with GCC 4.0.x on both 32-bit and 64-bit SPARC/Solaris. There is a significant difference with GCC 4.0.x though: the above results are valid only with GNU binutils (in this case 2.16.1 CVS), not with the Sun tools; in the latter case, there are several additional failures: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg01501.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg01499.html I've investigated a little and the additional failures seem to be related to strings and UTF-8 support. I don't really plan to dig further. I'll add a blurb about that in the platform-specific installation notes. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to fail|3.3.3 3.4.0 4.0.0 |3.3.3 3.4.0 4.0.0 4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353