From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15996 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2006 18:32:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 15982 invoked by uid 48); 1 Feb 2006 18:32:04 -0000 Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060201183204.15981.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/26063] memory leak in _Jv_Linker::link_symbol_table In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00094.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-01 18:32 ------- FWIW, some embedded users want to be able to remove ffi -- not for its own sake but because they also want to remove the interpreter, reflection info (see David Daney's recent proposal). It doesn't seem that hard to have a #if and avoid making a closure if libffi is not available. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26063