From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19616 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2006 20:21:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 19558 invoked by uid 48); 4 Feb 2006 20:21:08 -0000 Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060204202108.19557.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug java/26097] [4.2 regression]: Libjava failed to build In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00119.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 20:21 ------- CCing Ben as I think his abort -> gcc_assert patch caused this. I suspect one of the conversion caused a side effect to be removed when doing --disable-checking (which disables also the asserts). -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bje at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26097