From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14907 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2006 22:12:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 14887 invoked by uid 48); 6 Feb 2006 22:12:50 -0000 Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 22:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060206221250.14885.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/23495] java.lang.String.equals is suboptimal In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #9 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-06 22:12 ------- This seems to have stalled. I think my preferred solution here would be to use memcmp and let gcc and glibc fight it out for the best implementation. How far are we from having that be a reasonable approach? -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23495