From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9438 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2006 17:52:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 9424 invoked by uid 48); 8 Feb 2006 17:52:29 -0000 Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060208175229.9422.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/26177] [4.1 only] Exception when compiling valid regex pattern In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-08 17:52 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Subject: Re: [4.1 only] Exception when compiling valid regex pattern > > No, this is no regression. Java is not release critical to GCC so we > should just fix this bug as we fix many other bugs too. Not just > regressions. But if it unstablizes gcj, it is not worth the fix at least this late in the game. Also it is time just like fortran to start thinking about allowing for java to be release critical to GCC (see Mark M.'s email at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-02/msg00095.html ). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26177