From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32578 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2006 21:40:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 32558 invoked by uid 48); 28 Feb 2006 21:40:22 -0000 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060228214022.32557.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/26483] Wrong parsing of doubles when interpreted In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "schwab at suse dot de" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00270.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #6 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-02-28 21:40 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > The number 5e-324 exceeds the range of the (C language) double type. So the > > It's (just) within the range of denormal values for IEEE double precision. 5e-324 is already out of range. The limit is about 4.941e–324. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26483