From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3644 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2006 21:50:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 3623 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2006 21:50:19 -0000 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060228215019.3622.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/26483] Wrong parsing of doubles when interpreted In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00271.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2006-02-28 21:50 ------- Subject: Re: Wrong parsing of doubles when interpreted On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, schwab at suse dot de wrote: > > > ------- Comment #6 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-02-28 21:40 ------- > (In reply to comment #5) > > > The number 5e-324 exceeds the range of the (C language) double type. So the > > > > It's (just) within the range of denormal values for IEEE double precision. > > 5e-324 is already out of range. The limit is about 4.941e–324. 4.941e-324 < 5e-324. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26483