From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-prs-return-7983-listarch-java-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7483 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2006 00:11:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 7465 invoked by uid 48); 12 Apr 2006 00:11:31 -0000
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 00:11:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20060412001131.7464.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-24481-11561@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug classpath/24481] SecureRandom.setSeed has no impact
In-Reply-To: <bug-24481-11561@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "david at jpackage dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-prs-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2
List-Id: <java-prs.sourceware.org>



------- Comment #8 from david at jpackage dot org  2006-04-12 00:11 -------
The first case. There is only one instance of SecureRandom. The calls to
nextBytes() are on the same object.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24481