From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2215 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2006 19:08:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 2195 invoked by uid 48); 12 Apr 2006 19:08:38 -0000 Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060412190838.2194.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/27066] libgcj native socket code does not support IPv6 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "cjw at daneel dot dyndns dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #5 from cjw at daneel dot dyndns dot org 2006-04-12 19:08 ------- There are probably disadvantages: it doesn't seem possible to bind to 127.0.0.1 this way. So choosing the socket domain that matches the address to bind/connect to is probably a good idea. I thought other java implementations use the IPv4-in-IPv6 system but now I'm not so sure about that. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27066