From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20625 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2006 12:52:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 20607 invoked by uid 48); 13 Jun 2006 12:52:26 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060613125226.20606.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug java/1305] [JSR133] GCJ ignores volatile modifier In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "aph at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00396.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 12:52 ------- Note that this patch has some problems. In particular, it doesn't work with BC-compiled code. Also, on x86 it doesn't insert memory barrier instructions, but this is arguably a bug in __sync_synchronize() rather than a problem with this patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1305