From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2041 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2006 13:59:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 2022 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jul 2006 13:59:51 -0000 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060712135951.2021.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug java/28352] gcj -C fails to generate line number info for method In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mckinlay at redhat dot com" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q3/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #4 from mckinlay at redhat dot com 2006-07-12 13:59 ------- I've committed a patch which fixes the "off by one" error seen with ecj-produced bytecode. The missing line number issue is a different bug. It seems that "gcj -C" simply does not generate any debug info for the "snafu" method in the example below. I'm reassigning this as a front-end bug. -- mckinlay at redhat dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|libgcj |java Summary|Interpreter: Stack trace |gcj -C fails to generate |line numbers sometimes |line number info for method |missing or incorrect | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28352