* [Bug java/28663] [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac
2006-08-09 14:37 [Bug java/28663] New: [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac bero at arklinux dot org
@ 2006-08-09 18:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-15 23:02 ` bero at arklinux dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-09 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug java/28663] [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac
2006-08-09 14:37 [Bug java/28663] New: [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac bero at arklinux dot org
2006-08-09 18:03 ` [Bug java/28663] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-15 23:02 ` bero at arklinux dot org
2006-08-16 0:01 ` bero at arklinux dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bero at arklinux dot org @ 2006-08-15 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #1 from bero at arklinux dot org 2006-08-15 23:02 -------
Some debugging shows this is related to the new jar -- if I use jar from gcc
4.1.x (or just fastjar 0.93 from www.sourceforge.net/projects/fastjar) to
generate the ecj.jar file, I can binary-compile it with gcj 4.2 just fine (I
also used gcj 4.2 to turn the .java files into .class files in both cases).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug java/28663] [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac
2006-08-09 14:37 [Bug java/28663] New: [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac bero at arklinux dot org
2006-08-09 18:03 ` [Bug java/28663] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-15 23:02 ` bero at arklinux dot org
@ 2006-08-16 0:01 ` bero at arklinux dot org
2006-08-17 14:45 ` bero at arklinux dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bero at arklinux dot org @ 2006-08-16 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #2 from bero at arklinux dot org 2006-08-16 00:01 -------
Forget about the last comment - there was a typo in my "try old gcc version"
script that caused reverting to the old jar to revert to the old gcj for
.java->.class compilation too (but not for .jar->.so).
On a further look after noticing and fixing the typo, gcj's .java->.class
compiler is at fault.
gcj -C 4.1.1 + jar 4.1.1 + gcj 4.2.0 = ok
gcj -C 4.1.1 + jar 4.2.0 + gcj 4.2.0 = ok
gcj -C 4.2.0 + jar 4.2.0 + gcj 4.2.0 = broken
jikes + jar 4.2.0 + gcj 4.2.0 = ok
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug java/28663] [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac
2006-08-09 14:37 [Bug java/28663] New: [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac bero at arklinux dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-16 0:01 ` bero at arklinux dot org
@ 2006-08-17 14:45 ` bero at arklinux dot org
2006-08-20 22:33 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bero at arklinux dot org @ 2006-08-17 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #3 from bero at arklinux dot org 2006-08-17 14:45 -------
gcj -C miscompiles just org/eclipse/jdt/internal/compiler/lookup/Scope.java and
org/eclipse/jdt/internal/compiler/ast/QualifiedTypeReference.java -- I can
generate a perfectly working ecj using gcj -C for all files, then rebuilding
the .class files for those 2 files with jikes, then using gcj on the results.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug java/28663] [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac
2006-08-09 14:37 [Bug java/28663] New: [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac bero at arklinux dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-17 14:45 ` bero at arklinux dot org
@ 2006-08-20 22:33 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-26 17:35 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-20 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug java/28663] [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac
2006-08-09 14:37 [Bug java/28663] New: [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac bero at arklinux dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-20 22:33 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-26 17:35 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-26 17:37 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-26 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 17:35 -------
I need a test case. Please attach the .class of .jar to this PR.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-08-26 17:35:52
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug java/28663] [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac
2006-08-09 14:37 [Bug java/28663] New: [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac bero at arklinux dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-26 17:35 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-26 17:37 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-27 12:31 ` h dot mth at web dot de
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-26 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 17:37 -------
If you can generate this failure with just the class files, please supply those
instead of the whole jar.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug java/28663] [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac
2006-08-09 14:37 [Bug java/28663] New: [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac bero at arklinux dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-26 17:37 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-27 12:31 ` h dot mth at web dot de
2006-08-28 16:53 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: h dot mth at web dot de @ 2006-08-27 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #6 from h dot mth at web dot de 2006-08-27 12:31 -------
After some testing I can say that this is caused by the fix to bug 27529.
--
h dot mth at web dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |h dot mth at web dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug java/28663] [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac
2006-08-09 14:37 [Bug java/28663] New: [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac bero at arklinux dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-27 12:31 ` h dot mth at web dot de
@ 2006-08-28 16:53 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-28 21:45 ` h dot mth at web dot de
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-28 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug java/28663] [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac
2006-08-09 14:37 [Bug java/28663] New: [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac bero at arklinux dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-28 16:53 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-28 21:45 ` h dot mth at web dot de
2006-08-29 10:08 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: h dot mth at web dot de @ 2006-08-28 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #7 from h dot mth at web dot de 2006-08-28 21:45 -------
I stored my broken ecj-3.2.jar here:
http://geki.ath.cx/hacks/ecj.jar
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug java/28663] [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac
2006-08-09 14:37 [Bug java/28663] New: [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac bero at arklinux dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-28 21:45 ` h dot mth at web dot de
@ 2006-08-29 10:08 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-29 10:37 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-29 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 10:08 -------
OK, I'm working on this. It looks like a regression from 4.1.1 -> 4.1.2.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2006-08-26 17:35:52 |2006-08-29 10:08:28
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug java/28663] [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac
2006-08-09 14:37 [Bug java/28663] New: [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac bero at arklinux dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-29 10:08 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-29 10:37 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-29 14:05 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-29 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 10:37 -------
OK, here it is:
old:
14: invokevirtual <Method
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.Scope.getTypeOrPackage
(char[],int)org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.Binding>
17: checkcast <Class
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.ReferenceBinding>
20: areturn
new:
14: invokevirtual <Method
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.Scope.getTypeOrPackage
(char[],int)org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.Binding>
17: areturn
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug java/28663] [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac
2006-08-09 14:37 [Bug java/28663] New: [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac bero at arklinux dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-29 10:37 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-29 14:05 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-29 15:06 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-29 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #10 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 14:05 -------
class Psupersuper
{
}
class Psuper extends Psupersuper
{
}
class P extends Psuper
{
Psupersuper barf()
{
return new P();
}
}
class PR28663
{
static Psuper arse ()
{
return (P)new P().barf();
}
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug java/28663] [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac
2006-08-09 14:37 [Bug java/28663] New: [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac bero at arklinux dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-29 14:05 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-29 15:06 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-29 17:27 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-09 20:54 ` [Bug java/28663] [4.2/4.3 " tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-29 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #11 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 15:06 -------
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg01085.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug java/28663] [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac
2006-08-09 14:37 [Bug java/28663] New: [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac bero at arklinux dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-29 15:06 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-29 17:27 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-09 20:54 ` [Bug java/28663] [4.2/4.3 " tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-29 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #12 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 17:27 -------
PR 28067 blocks this -- when merging the gcj-eclipse branch to trunk,
we should remove the workaround patch.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |28067
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Bug java/28663] [4.2/4.3 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac
2006-08-09 14:37 [Bug java/28663] New: [4.2 regression] gcj fails to binary-compile eclipse's javac bero at arklinux dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-29 17:27 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-09 20:54 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-09 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #13 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:48 -------
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread