* [Bug libgcj/30424] [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64
2007-01-10 13:23 [Bug libgcj/30424] New: [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64 hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2007-01-10 14:55 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-01-10 15:37 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2007-01-10 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #1 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-10 14:55 -------
Created an attachment (id=12881)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12881&action=view)
A patch
I am testing this patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30424
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/30424] [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64
2007-01-10 13:23 [Bug libgcj/30424] New: [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64 hjl at lucon dot org
2007-01-10 14:55 ` [Bug libgcj/30424] " hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2007-01-10 15:37 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-10 15:48 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-10 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 15:37 -------
*** Bug 30422 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |schwab at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30424
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/30424] [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64
2007-01-10 13:23 [Bug libgcj/30424] New: [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64 hjl at lucon dot org
2007-01-10 14:55 ` [Bug libgcj/30424] " hjl at lucon dot org
2007-01-10 15:37 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-10 15:48 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-01-10 16:51 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2007-01-10 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-10 15:48 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=12881)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12881&action=view) [edit]
> A patch
>
> I am testing this patch.
>
It fixes the issue:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-01/msg00440.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30424
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/30424] [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64
2007-01-10 13:23 [Bug libgcj/30424] New: [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64 hjl at lucon dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-10 15:48 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2007-01-10 16:51 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-10 17:51 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-10 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 16:51 -------
That patch is fine.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-01-10 16:51:45
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30424
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/30424] [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64
2007-01-10 13:23 [Bug libgcj/30424] New: [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64 hjl at lucon dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-10 16:51 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-10 17:51 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-10 17:51 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-10 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 17:51 -------
Subject: Bug 30424
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jan 10 17:50:40 2007
New Revision: 120645
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120645
Log:
2007-01-10 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR libgcj/30424
* sysdep/ia64/locks.h (read_barrier): New.
(write_barrier): New.
Modified:
trunk/libjava/ChangeLog
trunk/libjava/sysdep/ia64/locks.h
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30424
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/30424] [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64
2007-01-10 13:23 [Bug libgcj/30424] New: [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64 hjl at lucon dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-10 17:51 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-10 17:51 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-01-10 18:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2007-01-10 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #6 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-10 17:51 -------
Fixed.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30424
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/30424] [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64
2007-01-10 13:23 [Bug libgcj/30424] New: [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64 hjl at lucon dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-10 17:51 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2007-01-10 18:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-10 14:44 ` oliver at linux-kernel dot at
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-10 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |4.2.0
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30424
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/30424] [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64
2007-01-10 13:23 [Bug libgcj/30424] New: [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64 hjl at lucon dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-10 18:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-04-10 14:44 ` oliver at linux-kernel dot at
2007-04-10 15:47 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: oliver at linux-kernel dot at @ 2007-04-10 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #7 from oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-04-10 15:44 -------
Same problem happens on alpha. read_barrier is not defined in sysdeps/locks.h.
Added read_barrier with a simple __sync_synchronize, but I guess this will not
work in real life... Just for testing... Can please check this someone?
Arg. Version is some Fedora Core(development): gcc-4.1.2-2007040.
--
oliver at linux-kernel dot at changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |oliver at linux-kernel dot
| |at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30424
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/30424] [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64
2007-01-10 13:23 [Bug libgcj/30424] New: [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64 hjl at lucon dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2007-04-10 14:44 ` oliver at linux-kernel dot at
@ 2007-04-10 15:47 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-10 16:11 ` oliver at linux-kernel dot at
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-04-10 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-10 16:47 -------
I don't have an Alpha to test, but I can see read_barrier() in HEAD:
inline static void
read_barrier()
{
__asm__ __volatile__("mb" : : : "memory");
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30424
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/30424] [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64
2007-01-10 13:23 [Bug libgcj/30424] New: [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64 hjl at lucon dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2007-04-10 15:47 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-04-10 16:11 ` oliver at linux-kernel dot at
2007-04-10 16:14 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-10 16:23 ` oliver at linux-kernel dot at
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: oliver at linux-kernel dot at @ 2007-04-10 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #9 from oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-04-10 17:11 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> I don't have an Alpha to test, but I can see read_barrier() in HEAD:
>
> inline static void
> read_barrier()
> {
> __asm__ __volatile__("mb" : : : "memory");
> }
>
OK and write_barrier() still is
inline static void
write_barrier()
{
__asm__ __volatile__("wmb" : : : "memory");
}
Sorry for asking, but I don't want to do the big checkout now :-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30424
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/30424] [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64
2007-01-10 13:23 [Bug libgcj/30424] New: [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64 hjl at lucon dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2007-04-10 16:11 ` oliver at linux-kernel dot at
@ 2007-04-10 16:14 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-10 16:23 ` oliver at linux-kernel dot at
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-04-10 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #10 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-10 17:14 -------
I don't know what you're asking. It's fixed in HEAD, and it's fixed in Fedora
development.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30424
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [Bug libgcj/30424] [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64
2007-01-10 13:23 [Bug libgcj/30424] New: [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64 hjl at lucon dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2007-04-10 16:14 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-04-10 16:23 ` oliver at linux-kernel dot at
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: oliver at linux-kernel dot at @ 2007-04-10 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #11 from oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-04-10 17:23 -------
Andrew. It's OK. write_barrier() is fine in Fedora Development. But
read_barrier() is missing in libjava/sysdep/alpha/lock.h. Just forget it :-)
Thx!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30424
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread