From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28625 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2007 21:53:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 28610 invoked by uid 48); 11 Jun 2007 21:53:54 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070611215354.28609.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug java/32247] -Wall enables -Wunused enables -Wunused-parameter In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-11 21:53 ------- Not really because this is a standard GCC option and having it different between java and other languages is wrong. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.2.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html Please read the documentation before really filing a bug, really an unused parameter is wrong because it usually means either you have conditional code (which case you). -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32247