From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31558 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2007 23:50:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 31539 invoked by uid 48); 11 Jun 2007 23:50:04 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070611235004.31538.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug java/32247] -Wall enables -Wunused enables -Wunused-parameter In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-11 23:50 ------- There were a couple of things wrong with the way this was reported, first it was reported against 4.1 which actually still has a java source compiler but then it was mentioned it was really for ecj connection. Can people actually report against what they are really using? If they use a modified version of GCC from redhat, please report to them first and not to us, we don't always know what is going on with distro's compilers. This is the main reason why I closed it. The second reason is because the documentation is quiet clear, that this option is enable. If you don't program OOP this way, then you have the option of disabling the option, it is not like there is no option. This is really a style issue. I can tell you how many times even in Java code this option is useful. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|4.1.0 |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32247