From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16728 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2007 20:11:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 16707 invoked by uid 48); 27 Jul 2007 20:11:54 -0000 Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 20:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070727201154.16706.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/30071] make install fails for libjava In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-27 20:11 ------- I don't think we should use this particular patch. My reason is that ordering alone is insufficient to guarantee success here, if the user uses "make -j". Instead, explicit dependencies should be used. In addition to fixing the above these might be a bit more resilient (who knows?) when automake changes. See comment #1 for an example; basically an install target for an executable should depend on the needed library install target. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30071