* [Bug target/32853] [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases
2007-07-22 15:18 [Bug java/32853] New: [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2007-07-22 19:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-24 7:21 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-07-22 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Component|java |target
Summary|[4.3 regression] failing |[4.3 regression] failing
|libjava testcases |libjava testcases
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32853
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/32853] [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases
2007-07-22 15:18 [Bug java/32853] New: [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2007-07-22 19:33 ` [Bug target/32853] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-07-24 7:21 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2007-07-27 16:57 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2007-07-24 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #1 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2007-07-24 07:21 -------
glibc 2.6 related? unreproducible with a glibc downgraded to 2.5
Matthias
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32853
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/32853] [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases
2007-07-22 15:18 [Bug java/32853] New: [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2007-07-22 19:33 ` [Bug target/32853] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-24 7:21 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2007-07-27 16:57 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2007-07-27 18:19 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2007-07-27 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #2 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2007-07-27 16:57 -------
this is not a bug in gij, but in glibc (2.6?), apparently fixed by:
2006-11-30 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S: Provide CFI for the outermost
`clone' function to ensure proper unwinding stop of gdb.
and
2006-11-30 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/clone.S: Provide CFI for the outermost
`clone' function to ensure proper unwinding stop of gdb.
found in the glibc FC branch, but not in HEAD and glibc-2_6-branch.
Matthias
--
debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32853
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/32853] [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases
2007-07-22 15:18 [Bug java/32853] New: [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-07-27 16:57 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2007-07-27 18:19 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2007-07-28 0:01 ` daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2007-07-27 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #3 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2007-07-27 18:19 -------
Reopened:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2007/07/msg00346.html:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:16:00PM +0000, aurel32@alioth.debian.org wrote:
> +2006-11-30 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> +
> + * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S: Provide CFI for the outermost
> + `clone' function to ensure proper unwinding stop of gdb.
I don't get it. The changelog entry is for _adding_ the directives
and matches the changelog entry in glibc HEAD. This patch removes
them.
If removing them makes anything better then it's got to be a bug in
java's unwinder.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32853
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/32853] [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases
2007-07-22 15:18 [Bug java/32853] New: [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-07-27 18:19 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2007-07-28 0:01 ` daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-28 0:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-07-28 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 00:01 -------
Java just uses the unwinder in libgcc_s. The same one that C++ and C use. If
it is a problem with the unwinder one might expect to see it in those languages
as well.
However, it would seem to be somewhat system dependent:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-07/msg01070.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-07/msg01090.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-07/msg00995.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32853
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/32853] [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases
2007-07-22 15:18 [Bug java/32853] New: [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-07-28 0:01 ` daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-07-28 0:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-10 0:51 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-10 6:25 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-07-28 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 00:21 -------
One should read:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2006-12/msg00100.html
And:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-12/msg00178.html
I don't know if this counts as a GCC bug or a glibc one now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32853
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/32853] [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases
2007-07-22 15:18 [Bug java/32853] New: [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2007-07-28 0:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-08-10 0:51 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-10 6:25 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-08-10 0:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32853
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/32853] [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases
2007-07-22 15:18 [Bug java/32853] New: [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2007-08-10 0:51 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-08-10 6:25 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2007-08-10 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #6 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2007-08-10 06:25 -------
The glibc patch now is included in glibc-2.6.1, the failing test cases are not
known anymore. Closing the report.
Matthias
--
debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32853
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread