From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23227 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2008 22:14:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 23205 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2008 22:14:04 -0000 Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080109221404.23204.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/33764] [4.2/4.3 regression] gij is built as 32-bit binary when building multilib gcc In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenther at suse dot de" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-01-09 22:14 ------- Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 regression] gij is built as 32-bit binary when building multilib gcc On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-09 22:03 ------- > What should we do here? > I think the problem is that we have a single bindir, but we are > building multiple executables -- one per multilib. Well, usually you don't multi-"lib" binaries - which is why it is called multilibbing, not multibinaring ;) No idea how easy that is to implement, though. Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33764