From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8533 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2008 20:56:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 8513 invoked by uid 48); 3 Feb 2008 20:56:19 -0000 Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 20:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080203205619.8512.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/30071] make install fails for libjava In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00066.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-03 20:56 ------- Ughh, I completely forgot about this PR. But I remember having had some issues with the generated Makefile.in. It had some more places which were modified than I expected. So I may actively forgot about this issue. I usually do the testing of a patch on different archs. And if it succeeds, I prepare the patch on my main working arch which is OS-X. So here the preparation caused some headache on my side. But after jumping in again, I see it seems to be a problem of my environment rather than the patch itself. Doing the prep on x86-linux or hpux itself shows only the modification in the patch itself for Makfile.in. I attach a new version of the patch which should solve the problem for now. Comments? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30071