From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5629 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2008 15:58:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 5609 invoked by uid 48); 17 Feb 2008 15:57:59 -0000 Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080217155759.5608.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug classpath/21869] We should to use StringBuilder instead of StringBuffer where appropriate. In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-02-17 15:57 ------- Waiting on my patch to abstract StringBuffer/Builder being committed. Then this is simply a matter of adding a class which uses the 'dont_copy' version of the String constructor with toString. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21869