From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6793 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2008 23:00:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 6773 invoked by uid 48); 27 Feb 2008 23:00:55 -0000 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080227230055.6772.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug classpath/21869] We should to use StringBuilder instead of StringBuffer where appropriate. In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00132.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-02-27 23:00 ------- The new structure is committed. As StringBuilder is final, we will have to clone AbstractStringBuilder in the gnu.classpath package. This is not too problematic, as we don't expect the internal class to need to change. -- gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2008-02-17 15:58:22 |2008-02-27 23:00:53 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21869