From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17331 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2008 23:06:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 17263 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2008 23:06:34 -0000 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081104230634.17262.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug java/37068] [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI version detected In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "aph at redhat dot com" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q4/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #31 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-11-04 23:06 ------- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI version detected dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote: > ------- Comment #30 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-11-04 19:01 ------- > Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI > version detected > >> That error now is gone, but we may only have stepped to the next error on these >> platforms. We can decide if it should continue in this bug or a new bug should >> be opened. > > If the error is releated to the running of constructors for class > registration or resource registration, then I think we should continue > with this bug. Otherwise, it's a new bug. OK, but I need to know if my patch has been tested well enough for me to check it in. I'm fairly certain it doesn't break x86 GNU/Linux. Andrew. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37068