From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13755 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2008 11:03:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 13737 invoked by uid 48); 10 Dec 2008 11:03:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081210110300.13736.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/38396] [4.4 Regression] libgcj_bc for 4.3 and 4.4 are binary incompatible but have the same SONAME In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q4/txt/msg00097.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 11:03 ------- Are you sure? My Debian system agrees with me: ls -l /usr/lib/libgcj_bc.so.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2008-10-01 20:38 /usr/lib/libgcj_bc.so.1 -> libgcj.so.90 Are the different libgcj not supposed to provide the same indirect dispatch ABI for all versions? btw, how does this affect link-time? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38396