From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29978 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2008 12:44:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 29955 invoked by uid 48); 11 Dec 2008 12:44:29 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081211124429.29954.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/10353] Java testsuite failures In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q4/txt/msg00120.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #33 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-11 12:44 ------- > Eric, you would "add a blurb about that in the platform-specific installation > notes" (comment #25). Did that happen? No, it didn't, IIRC I wasn't sure of my analysis at all. > What do you, as a SPARC port maintainer, think what should happen with > this bug? WONTFIX seems appropriate, there has been essentially zero interest from the SPARC or the Java maintainers for the Java compiler on SPARC/Solaris, ever. Let's just wait for PR from users of this compiler, if any. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Keywords|wrong-code | Resolution| |WONTFIX Summary|[4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] |Java testsuite failures |Java testsuite failures | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353